Title: AI vs Human: Who Describes Better?

Q: Read carefully before you choose.
Look at the painting below. Then read the two descriptions.
One of them was written by a human, the other by an AI tool.
Choose the one you believe was written by a human — and think about why.
- A young woman turns slightly away from us, as if someone has just called her name from outside the frame. Her hands rest gently on a small white animal, whose tense body and bright eye make the scene feel strangely alive. The soft light picks out the smooth skin of her face and the folds of her dress, while the dark background keeps our focus entirely on her – calm, alert, and a little mysterious. (correct) (Correct! The text uses personal interpretation and emotional detail, typical of human writing.) (if not chosen: You may want to compare the level of detail and emotional tone between the two descriptions.)
  Hint: This description contains emotional nuance and detailed observation.
- The painting shows a woman holding a white animal in her arms. She is wearing a dress and looking to the side. The background is dark and plain. The style of the portrait is realistic and the light falls on her face and hands. The image is a typical example of Renaissance portraiture. (Not quite. This description sounds more neutral and patterned, which is typical of AI-generated text.) (if not chosen: Look for emotional nuance and personal interpretation to identify human writing.)
  Hint: This description is clear but more formulaic and generic.
Feedback (0 to 0%): Keep looking closely! Notice how emotional tone, detail and personal interpretation often reveal human writing.
Feedback (1 to 100%): Great observation! You identified the human description by focusing on nuance, emotion and specific detail.
[Image: Renaissance portrait: Lady with an Ermine, Leonardo da Vinci]